Lotly vs. Innago for Mobile Home Parks
Innago serves a different market than enterprise tools — free for landlords with payment-processing fees passed to tenants. For small mom-and-pop landlords running a handful of units, it's a sensible choice. It's not built for MHP scale or workflow sophistication.
| Feature | Lotly | Innago |
|---|---|---|
| Lot-level occupancy tracking | Native | Generic unit/lease |
| Lot rent vs. home rent split | Native, separate billing | Single rent only |
| Park-aware tenant screening | Built-in (TU + criminal + housing records) | Basic add-on |
| ACH-first rent collection | Default; sub-$1 per transaction | Available; not default |
| Built-in certified mail | Native one-click | Not native |
| Infill stage tracking | Native 6-stage pipeline | Not native |
| Owner statements | MHP-formatted, no QBO required | Basic |
| Tenant portal mobile-first | Sub-90-second pay flow | Mobile-friendly |
| Pricing model | Per-lot, vacant-free, month-to-month | Free for landlords |
| Built specifically for MHP | Yes — designed for parks from day one | Generic small-landlord |
Where Innago wins
The free pricing model is genuinely useful for landlords running 5-50 units who don't need enterprise features. Setup is simple, the mobile experience is fine, and the tenant payment flow works.
Where it doesn't fit MHP
Innago is built for the small-landlord generalist use case. There's no concept of lot vs. home rent, no certified mail, no infill tracking, no owner statements for investor partners. For a single park or a handful of units, it could work; for any multi-park operator, the gaps are immediate.
Pricing comparison
Innago is free for landlords; payment processing fees are passed to tenants. Lotly charges per-lot but absorbs ACH fees on the operator side, which means the effective cost per dollar of rent collected can favor Lotly even for small portfolios — and the workflow advantages compound at scale.
When to switch
Operators who acquire their second park or hit 100+ lots typically outgrow Innago within months. The migration is straightforward because Innago doesn't store much MHP-specific data to migrate.
Best for
Innago: Small landlords (under 50 units) running a few rental units, including a few park lots.
Lotly: Mobile-home-park-first operators who want lot-level workflows, certified mail, infill stage tracking, and per-lot vacant-free pricing without the apartment-DNA workarounds.
Pricing
Innago: Free for landlords; tenants pay payment-processing fees.
Lotly: Per-lot pricing with vacant lots free. Month-to-month contract — no annual lock-in. See pricing →